The British Library has published its draft content strategy for consultation, closing on 21 July. This is the first stage, comprising general principles and more detailed statements for the arts and humanities and social sciences. Science, technology and medicine are to follow at a later, unspecified date and are only covered in a preliminary way.
There are fourteen points on which they invite comment (some of these don't make much sense unless you read them with the whole document):
Q1 Please comment on the Library’s approach to developing a ‘content strategy’ as defined in 3.2.1 - 3.2.2.
Q2 Please comment on any of the implications of the British Library shifting its focus to a content strategy, as described in 3.3.1 - 3.3.3.
Q3 Please comment on the British Library’s approach to managing the print-digital transition, as described in 3.4.1 – 3.4.3.
Q4 Do you agree with the Library’s assessment of the key drivers and practical considerations that should influence its content strategy (4.1.1 – 4.1.2)?
Q5 Please comment on the British Library’s overall proposal for what it should and should not change within its content strategy (5.1.1 – 5.1.2).
Q6 Within the context of finite Library resources, do you wish to make any suggestions about where the Library should decrease or increase its collecting? Please provide a rationale for any suggestions you wish to make.
Q7 Please comment on any of the draft format strategies in Appendix 2. (Please state clearly the name and number of the table you are referring to.)
Q8 Please comment on the British Library’s proposed high-level content strategy for the arts and humanities (5.2.1 – 5.2.5).
Q9 Please comment on any of the draft content strategies for arts and humanities disciplines in Appendix 1. (Please state clearly the name and number of the table you are referring to.)
Q10 Please comment on the British Library’s proposed high-level content strategy for the social sciences (5.3.1 – 5.3.5).
Q11 Please comment on any of the draft content strategies for social science disciplines in Appendix 1. (Please state clearly the name and number of the table you are referring to.)
Q12 Please comment on the Library’s preliminary thinking about its high-level content strategy for science, technology and medicine, as outlined in 5.4.5.
Q13 What factors do you believe the Library should consider as it continues to develop a partnership strategy that meets the needs of UK researchers (6.1.1 – 6.1.4)?
Q14 Please comment on the Library’s proposed approach for developing a deeper ongoing dialogue about its content strategy with researchers (6.2.1 – 6.2.3). Are there other mechanisms we should consider?
Technorati Tags: BL
Recent Comments