Today's Observer Review runs a piece, easily found in spite of the recent hideous redesign of that section, on blogging. There are several flaws in it which I'm sure have already been pointed out by others with quicker fingers than me. But for what its worth, here's my view:
1. Why concentrate on blogs that are essentially trivial? I would have expected the Observer to be aware of the political blog. And apart from the confessional and domestic, there are serious uses of blogging. It's puzzling that the author didn't turn to the Observer's sister paper, the Guardian, for help. The Guardian has a fine record of discussing blogging seriously.
2. Even so, accepting the criticism that many blogs are trivial and self-absorbed, it is a little rich for the Observer to describe them with such condescension. One only has to turn a page or two in the Review or other sections of the paper to discover a number of columns written by people who do not discuss the political, literary or artistic questions of the day, but write accounts of the tedium of their daily lives. Most of them write well and even amusingly sometimes, but are these anything more than bloggers using print and supported by the resources of a national Sunday newspaper?
Recent Comments