Open access and the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Enquiry

Peter Suber comments in Open Access News that the BioMedCentral list of online submissions to the Inquiry is the best. I humbly beg to differ.
They miss some that I have and link to an unauthorised version of the CILIP evidence which, CILIP say, should not be up until the committee has reported.
Of course the definitive list will be out when the Committee publishes its report: but exaggerated deference to British constitutional quirks by CILIP, SCONUL, and CURL means that the online view of the discussion at the moment lacks the contribution of some of the key participants