Two letters in today's THES in response to the piece on open archiving in the previous issue. Iain Stevenson claims, unconvincingly I think, that open access is only for the rich, while Steve Harnad corrects the impression given that he was arguing for self-archiving as a substitute for publication in peer-reviewed journals, rather than in addition. Online content is only available to subscribers, but the paper reference is: THES January 9 2004 1622: 17
Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Latest posts from my running blog
Tom's LibraryThing
Testimonials
- 'The most dangerous man in British librarianship' Anon, 1990s
- 'An intellectually arrogant Bolshevik'...'his reach exceeds his grasp' Headmaster, 1972
- 'Dear Sir,
There is a person on your staff called Tom Roper, whom I believe to be a librarian of some kind...' from a letter to the Vice-Chancellor of Sussex University, 26 June 2010
Search this blog with Google
November 2021
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
Recent Comments
- FlowCoef on Video, videre, vidi, visum
- Tom Roper on Video, videre, vidi, visum
- Sarah Rudd on Video, videre, vidi, visum
- D on On the 70th birthday of the NHS
- Roger Blayney on The Cambridge-Heidelberg Youth Orchestra in 1972
- Dori on Žižek: against charity
- D on On the 70th birthday of the NHS
- Friday on On the 70th birthday of the NHS
- Sarah Patalong on In memoriam Humphrey, 2011-2018
- Hazel Edmunds on In memoriam Humphrey, 2011-2018